The COUNTER project
recently announced that vendors wishing to remain compliant to the code of practice for books and reference works must now undergo a mandatory annual audit. Previously an audit was only required after the first year of delivering the usage reports.
This will be good news for those librarians who are concerned that the figures publishers provide after the first year of compliance might be inaccurate. An annual audit should ensure that no software errors suddenly appear.
However this will be bad news for those wanting to see costs kept down in a sector which is already hugely challenged by budget cuts. Publishers must bear the extra costs of the annual audit, and it’s hard to imagine that these will not be passed on to libraries in some way.
The audit must be carried out by a professional organisation recognised by the COUNTER project. This includes
ABC Electronic in the UK, who offer a fixed price for this service. I contacted ABC Electronic to find out their prices but I did not recieve a reply.
It’s hard to imagine a worse time for this change. Although the financial impact will be fairly small, costs and budgets are being squeezed from all sides at the moment. Lets hope there are no more changes like this in the pipeline.
Update: After I published this ABC Electronic saw this blog post and called me to apologise for not replying to my email enquiry, and I subsequently received pricing details for the COUNTER compliance auditing service they provide.
Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to mark the end of an era. I’m talking about the passing of Web 3.0 – ostensibly the era of the next great revolution in the information industry.
In its short life the semantic web we knew so little passed through the peak of inflated expectation, went round the cape of unrealistic ambition and finally found a resting place in the great junkyard of unwanted technology in the virtual cloud. At one time our information industry seemed to have the most to gain (or lose) from the threats and opportunities presented by our recently lost friend. So, what went wrong? Continue reading 
We’re all familiar with the difficulty of finding relevant information inside huge sets of search results. The sheer scale of many information resources forces us to iteratively refine and adapt our search queries until either we find the information we need or we abandon our search.
Using taxonomies, thesauri or ontologies to tag our information resources allows us to help users find information more quickly. This in turn leads to increased usage, driving renewals and additional sales of information at the point of discovery. Abandoned searches are clearly a failure in this context!
Here are the four most important techniques for improving search by leveraging taxonomies, thesauri and ontologies.
