E-learning and online publishing converge beyond the book

Laptop and old booksThe printed book has been referred to as the most significant breakthrough ever in learning technology (bigger even than the blackboard). Surely it’s unimprovable as a means for conveying ideas, facts and knowledge from one mind to another? Well perhaps not. Now that online publishing has moved beyond simply putting books online as pdfs, we are beginning to see a far more active development of the possibilities when it comes to extending the use of texts online for learning. An important next stage in this maturity curve is adding interactive features such as assessment, and learner feedback. Beyond that, we are also beginning to see use of more advanced, ‘Web 2.0′ features, such as the ability to add user-generated content. And something that’s becoming clear, as academic and reference publishing develops in this direction, is the emergence of areas of convergence between e-publishing and e-learning, which up till now have been distinct fields. Continue reading

Think Rapid: more choice for online publishers

Online publishing is an evolving industry, and an important aspect of that evolution is the ability of the supplier community to innovate. This means not only technology innovation but innovation in process and business models; the ability to offer publishers greater efficiencies in the publishing process and more choice. To date, publishers have had a rather limited choice when it comes to placing their content online. It was either a case of using an aggregated portal, which meant sacrificing control over functionality and user experience, or bespoke development, which would give you that control, but at the cost, usually, of a substantial investment in time and budget, and the risk that you might get it wrong. Software design is not a simple thing. Now the choice has widened. ’Rapid‘ processes and methodologies offer a new set of options. Continue reading

Facing a double whammy, publishers should box clever

Received wisdom is that in recessions businesses fall prey to ‘short-termism’, and that this is necessarily a bad thing. But the truth is that even the most far-sighted, deep-pocketed publisher will have a different orientation towards risk and investment in times like these. With resources constrained and markets uncertain, greater business agility becomes not just a fashionable mantra but a necessary attribute for survival. That’s not the same thing as short-termism. It’s all about speed and flexibility. Continue reading

Library Journal's LaGuardia gives Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology a solid ten

We were highly gratified recently to receive a highly complimentary review of our work on behalf of Wiley-Blackwell for the Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Online (BESO) in Library Journal. This is an especially prized accolade since the reviewer Cheryl LaGuardia, Research Librarian for the Widener Library at Harvard University, is by her own admission not exactly given to lavishing praise on such resources:
“I’m usually not a fan of reference books that are turned into e-products, but this one has been converted quite intelligently. Most important, the e-version transcends the print – you can find more there and do more with what you find. It’s a solid ten.”

E-learning: across the great divide

The divide between e-learning and e-information A discussion the Semantico team had recently with David Worlock of Outsell highlighted areas of convergence between online publishing and e-learning, two worlds that have previously seemed oddly sealed off from each other. I go regularly to the Learning Technologies exhibition in January, where the great and the good of UK e-learning gather, and also to more publishing-focused shows such as Online Information and BETT – and I’m often struck by the lack of overlap both in exhibitors and attendees. What we’re looking at, in market terms, is two quite distinct industries; of very different scale (e-learning is much smaller), structured differently, and with their own dynamics – each possessing its own distinctive terminology, guru community and media universe. There ought to be more points of contact in the area of education; but in many ways this is where the differences are most marked. If I were to point to one philosophical sticking point that underlies this difference, it would concern an issue close to every publisher’s heart: the status of authoritative texts. Continue reading